Saturday, 1 February 2014

St John's Anglican Cathedral Parramatta

Date: 19 January 2014

8am Service                       

Service Type: AAPB 2nd Order Holy Communion     
Worship Leader: Rev’d Bruce Morrison 
Numbers: 70 -80 attended Demographic: a spread of ages and ethnic groups
Music: traditional hymns sung well, accompanied by organ
Readings: Two readings: Isaiah and Hebrews. Hebrews was read as the Gospel reading.
After the Gospel, the Creed was said and then the sermon (1662 order)
Sermon: Delivered by the Rector of the Parish. (20-25 minutes long)
About listening to God through reading the bible. Well delivered but a little controversial in substance. (see later)
The Communion: The communion was led by the Rector at the communion table. Then we were invited forward to traditional altar rails to take communion. I filed up in my turn and found at the steps of the sanctuary trays of little cups - one tray labelled 'grape juice' another 'wine'. I took the bread and wine at the altar rails then  returned to my seat. Essentially, there were three options for taking communion, cup of wine, cup of juice, chalice of wine. Also, a second communion station was set up in the transept side at the east end of the nave.
After Communion: There was a hymn, with an offering plate circulated, then a final prayer and the service ended.
After the Service: The whole service was about an hour. After the service one of the lay ministers in robes approached me and talked with me and introduced me to the clergy. I talked with the Rector about the Hebrews reading. I said it was an odd choice for a gospel reading. He said he always tried to make sure there was an Old Testament Reading and a New Testament one sat every service. 
 I stayed then for the second 9:30 am service.

General Comments: This was a traditional service and used no contemporary technology. The pews were hard wooden and the furnishings very old world which was a mark of the building built in 1852. All the Worship leaders were in robes, and the clergy well dressed in clergy collars and suits. 

9:30 am service

Service Type: Family service
Worship Leader: Rev'd Tom Harricks
Numbers: 120- 130.
Demographic: many young families, a large number of children, almost 50% Asian people. 

Readings: Isaiah and Hebrews again, Hebrews read as the Gospel.
Sermon: Rev'd Bruce Morrison More lucid at this service - exactly 23 minutes. 
Flow of liturgy: informal welcome, scripture sentence, children's talk (on John 4: only gospel paraphrased for the morning) led by laywoman and done very well, Notices, interview with student minister, interview with various people regarding coming events (strange extended break in the service) intercessions followed by lay woman - delivered very well and with reference to many current news items and issues, Reading of Isaiah, then Hebrews (readers were excellent), then sermon ( exactly the same as the previous service read from written text), hymns and songs used well a band played which was very enjoyable, communion followed as at early service, final song and then prayer and then the service was finished.
After the Service: 

Talked to a lovely lay woman after the service who looked after us.
Extra Comments:
The use of technology was very good - the screens unfurled for use and disappeared when not in use. It allowed the traditional building to look contemporary for the younger group and traditional for the older one. Very slick. Pews were wood and hard, the service was on paper and on the screen, and bibles in the pews to follow the text during the reading and preaching.

General Reflections and Recommendations


Concerns and compliments about this Anglican Community
1. This community has a long history in an historic building and I think they make the most of both their heritage for their older community members and their resources for contemporary worship. The use of technology was impressive. The Building was impressive in its own right, and has been well looked after.
2. The use of robes and clergy collars made the leadership of services much easier to follow. Rev Tom Harricks was in shirt and tie which detracted from the traditional clerical attire worn by other clergy. Distinctive clothing might be seen as anachronistic, but it still works for the police, nurses, pilots, armed forces, airline workers and many other professions.
3. The use of grape juice at communion is still a poor and unnecessary option for Anglicans. People who have trouble with wine, should just take the Bread only.  Communion in 'one kind' is considered full communion in the Anglican Tradition and Canon Law.
4. I didn't appreciate notices in the middle of a service that went for 8-10 minutes.
5. Christian leaders must know that readings from the Epistles as the Gospel for the day is a poor effort. There should always be a reading from the life of Jesus. This has been the tradition of the church, and you would think a community that wants to grow close to Jesus, would want to hear his words and listen to his actions as recorded in the gospels every time they met.
6. What happened to the Book of Psalms? The Anglican church has made a routine of reciting psalms at Sunday worship for 400 years. Now it seems to have stopped. What does it mean that evangelical churches have given up the Psalter?
7. The Rector preached and did a pretty good job. I did  have one concern. He addressed the Isaiah reading saying that Isaiah wrote 150 years before the events he predicted. First, this is not true. Second Isaiah, which the Rector doesn't seem to acknowledge, was written just as the events described were finishing. To state that prophecy in the bible implies prediction of future events is to misunderstand the genre completely. If we read Lawrence Boadt or Gerhard Von Rad they remind us that prophecy is about speaking the truth from God to the people of God. It is this uncompromising judgement and quest for justice that makes the prophet's ministry so valuable and the prophet's lot so awful. Isaiah doesn't need miraculous powers of prognostication to make his work inspired. Other than this point, i felt he preached with passion and with integrity.

SCORECARD

Welcome: 4/5
liturgical sense: 4/10
Music: 8/10
Technology Use: 4/5
Sacramental aptitude: 6/10
Building look and comfort: 4/5
Children Friendly: 4/5
Anglican-like Worship: 7/10

OVERALL: 41/60 OR 68%

John Gumbley

Saturday, 18 January 2014

St Philip's Anglican Church Eastwood

9 am service

Service Type: Family Service
Worship Leader: Chris Burgess
Numbers: 70-80
Demographic: a  range of ages and cultures despite the holiday season, but generally plenty of older people.
The building: The service was taken in the traditional church building, stone, stained-glass, steeple, and hard brown wooden pews. 
The leadership: The leadership of the service was oddly difficult to discern. There were no robes worn or distinctive clergy dress. Rev. Burgess seemed to be leading the early part of the service, and the rector was sitting in the pews and came forward to conduct the holy communion in the second part of the service. 
Liturgical Form and Flow: The opening had an informal welcome, a printed sheet of the order of service was reproduced on the overhead screen. first, an opening traditional hymn (organ accompanying), then pre-written prayer, kids talk, then notices, gospel, creed, intercessions, second reading from Genesis 12, then bible talk (sermon), lord's supper, closing hymn ( with Collection), then final prayer.
Readings: The Readings of Scripture were John 12 (palm Sunday reading) and then Genesis 12.
Sermon: Chris Burgess came forward from the congregation in suit and tie to preach. Sermon was 27 minutes. The sermon, called a bible talk, was exactly that. The preacher worked through Genesis and exodus, while people in pews followed the texts in their pew bibles. 7/10.
The Holy Communion: The Rector came forward in smart casual dress and said the great thanksgiving prayer over the elements. Then we were invited forward to traditional altar rails to take communion. I filed up in my turn and found at the steps of the sanctuary trays of little cups - one tray labelled 'grape juice' another 'wine'. I took the wine only to find i had the option of the chalice when i got to the rails. I received the bread, and then administered my own wine and returned to my seat. Essentially, there were three options for taking communion, cup of wine, cup of juice, chalice of wine.After the Service: I was welcomed and spoken to by a number of laity. The Rector made a personal approach to speak with me, and spoke to me for some time. 

Comments and Commendations about this community 

1. This community has made an effort to be all things to all people. The three options at communion is one example this hybrid methodology. When I asked the Rector why the grape juice was offered, he told me it was in response to the many p plate drivers amongst their younger members who cannot have any alcohol if they are driving. this seems like a valid pastoral response, but in reality i think it is a lazy response. Why not get them to car pool and abstain from taking the wine if they are driving. The Church allows for taking communion in one kind. This generation thinks it is the first one to deal with pastoral concerns over alcohol. It is not. The church has adjusted its practice in the past without introducing grape juice, but somehow Sydney Diocese has decided to rework a 400 year old solution. In reality, the use of grape juice, which is a Sydney Diocese amendment to the tradition, is really a political statement and demonstrates their'reformed' anti-catholic practices. I think Eastwood's practice might be dressed up well to sound like pastoral care, but is actually showing the political stripe of the Diocese. I would love to ask the Parish if they encourage their young drivers to take the wine after they receive their full licence.
2.  I'd also like to ask why they use little cups as an option for the wine. If they say its for people who are afraid of catching a bug from the common cup, this would make me deeply sad. I have researched this issue in detail and there is no evidence that a silver chalice filled with alcohol can ever transfer germs. This is the reason for the silver and the alcohol; that it is hygienic to share. it is disappointing to see a community capitulate to people's fears and complaints. 
3. This community did read a gospel passage, which I found heartening, but from the palm Sunday gospel. This made no sense in the liturgy and was never referred to in the preaching. I'm amazed that these evangelical churches have jettisoned the psalm. The psalms were Jesus' own prayer book, and the gospels tell us Jesus quoted from them often in his teaching. The Anglican church has made it part of its prayer life for four hundred years, but the Sydney bible- based churches have decided not to bother. Disappointing.
4. The building and furnishings were traditional, which made me feel at home. This community seems to value their heritage in the way they look after their lovely buildings and traditional pews and stained-glass windows. The grounds were also immaculate and give the impression of a much loved venue.
5. The lack of robes and clergy collars and other normal worship garments was disappointing and disorienting. with no distinctive dress, it was hard to tell who were clergy, who were leading various parts of the service and how we are to understand their leadership. If clergy, we know they are learned and pastorally accountable. If laity, then maybe effusive and expressing personal faith and experience. I found confusing not to know who was leading what parts of the service and who they were. Robes and collars let the community know who is a leader and that they have training or learning that enables them to lead a particular part of the liturgy. 
6. The sense of liturgy. The flow of the worship was pretty good, but I must confess that their lack of attention to the prayer life, meant there was no lord's prayer and no confession, both which are mandatory for Eucharistic Worship. the omission of confession is particularly poor practice. 


SCORECARD

Welcome: 4/5
liturgical sense: 5/10
Music: 3/10
Technology Use: 2/5
Sacramental aptitude: 6/10
Building look and comfort: 4/5
Children Friendly: 3/5Anglican-like Worship: 5/10
OVERALL: 32/60 OR 53%

Reasoning: Too many changes to traditional liturgy that means the readings were disconnected, essential elements of worship were missing, and grape juice is being used really because it is desperately trying to be protestant rather than a proper expression of faith. no collars for clergy or robes meant it was hard to discern the leaders and their place in the community. This unfortunately, is a Diocesan stupidity which the parish is reproducing. 
John Gumbley

Wednesday, 8 January 2014

St Paul’s Anglican Church, Carlingford

Address: Cnr Moseley Street and Vickery Avenue, Carlingford 2118
Date of visit:    29/12/2013      
Services attended: 7:45am and 9am


My Notes


7:45am Service                       

Service Type: AAPB 2nd Order Holy Communion,  
Advertised as a Traditional Service      
Worship Leader: Rev’d Bruce Hall
Numbers: about 30-35 Demographic: 90% over 60, 50% over 75.
Music: two hymns – old favourites, sung to accompanying piano, sung quietly.
Readings: Only Gospel read, All of Chapter 5 of Mark.
After Gospel, the Creed was said and then the sermon (1662 order)
Sermon: Delivered by the Retired Rector of the Parish. (20 -30 minutes long)
It was a retelling of the story of the gospel and how the action of the gospel for the day fits into the plot. Mainly verse by verse exposition, and delivered well.
The Communion: The communion was white commercial bread cut into little squares, and grape juice in little cups. The words of consecration were delivered by the Worship-leader from the lectern. Then the bread and grape juice were brought forward from the back table on the stage area, and passed around the pews.  
After Communion: there was a hymn, with an offering plate circulated, then a final prayer and the service ended.
General Comments: The whole service was finished in about 50 minutes.
Before and after the service I had a number of lay people approach me and greet me and welcome me to their community. I stayed then for the second 9am service.


9 am service

Service Type: general prayer and praise service (advertised as a Family service)
Worship Leader: Rev Gary Koo (Rector)
Numbers: around 130, down from its usual 160-180 because this was the holiday period.
Demographic: many young families, with a broad variety of ages, and ethnic groups, a broad cross section of the community.
The Service was led by the rector / chief pastor, his manner was warm and charming, affable if you like. It made the worship time easy to enter and comfortable.
The opening had a series of songs of faith, all on the data projector screen, with drums and piano and various instruments and three singers. These were done well, three in all and one for kids and two for all the family.
The early part of the service was spent introducing the Preacher who was a student minister, a young Asian man.
The service had prayers and intercessions. These were led from the front, and were clearly well prepared ahead of time.
Readings: The Reading of Scripture was from James 5: 13-20. It was explained that the community had been going through James and this was the concluding of that series.
At the conclusion of the reading, the creed again was said, and then the young preacher came forward to preach.
Sermon: The Sermon was very well delivered, because the preacher approached with humility and worked sensitively through a few tricky pastoral issues.  Length of sermon; about 15-20 minutes.
At the conclusion of the sermon, we had prayers, then songs then the service was ended.
After the Service: I was welcomed and spoken to by a number of laity. The Rector made a move to meet me also, and spent a few minutes talking to me about the community and the year ahead. 


General Reflections and Recommendations

Furnishings were very comfortable, which, including the prayers, was probably the best aspect of my time there . The bibles for the service were stored in wooden book-bins at the entrance to the worship space. The services were called meetings. The community seemed content and sedate. In discussion after the service various laity and the Rector told me the whole Parish is about 900-950 in number. This included six Sunday services, two in other languages and two in parish plants.
I asked about the parish plants (communities coming from the main community in Carlingford but being generated in other suburbs as part of an expansion program)
Church plants were made in Baulkham Hills, North Rocks and Berala. These communities meet in School halls, and have generated communities of their own over a few years.
The Name: The church recently adopted the name Crossway Anglican Churches. This has caused legal problems since a Baptist church in Victoria has objected to them using the name which they use as a brand. So the Carlingford Communities are working on a new name for their combined churches.
My experience as a visitor in the parish prompted the following prima facie observations:
  • The parish values numeric growth, bible studies to direct godly living, and mission work overseas. Bringing people to Jesus and living a gospel-centred life is the hub of their Christian Community Life.
  • The worship life is very warm and relaxed. There was a focus on faith-sharing, gospel living, mission supporting and bible study.
  • The group has a large and strong leadership group. They have a strong sense of the vision of their community and what they are trying to offer the wider community.
Concerns and compliments about this Anglican Community
  1. The worship has little formal liturgical shape. Even the early prayer book service was only vaguely following the liturgical form according to the rubrics in the book. The later family service had no Anglican shape in it at all.
  2. The celebration of the Holy Communion was done in a very informal way,  suggesting a fairly unsophisticated or underdeveloped sacramental theology.
  3. There were no robes, no clergy collars, no priestly titles, no symbols of the cross inside or outside the church. This is interesting considering the pictures on the website of the Rector’s ordination and induction has him in both clergy collar and robes. I’m not sure what to make of the ‘dress-ups’ for important occasions and the ‘dress-downs’ for Sunday worship.
  4. The creed seems to have an important place in the liturgy. I think the definite statements of belief are comforting and good directives for a community of this kind.
  5. I think these services were starved for bible readings and for the many families that came to be fed on the word of God this is very concerning. The Anglican Church tradition has always made mandatory the reading of the Gospel (the life of Jesus from the witness of the evangelists) as part of Holy Communion services. It is also staggering that a church claiming to be bible-based has their main morning worship with families with only eight verses from James. 
  6. The prayers were done really well, and it was pleasing for me to hear well prepared intercessions (prayers on behalf of the world and those in need and wider church). I have been to Churches who forget intercessory prayer, and it shows a myopic and blinkered view of the church’s life and work. This Community has a commendable prayer practice.
  7. I listened to four sermons delivered by various preaches in this community. Two on the day and two on their website. The preaching is direct expository homiletics, and tends to be delivered warmly and with an earthy charisma but with a simplicity which may be comforting to some but frustrating for others. As a person who appreciates depth of theological ideas and debate, the simple nature of instruction from bible principles would leave me a little starved for intellectual content.
  8. I am surprised for a church who calls itself 'cross-way' that there was not a single Cross symbol inside or outside the building. Why Churches in Sydney feel they must ditch the symbol of the sacrifice of Jesus which for 2000 years has been the dominant symbol of the world faith is deeply concerning. Why you would do this and then name your church 'cross-way' i think shows a church whose mind and heart is distracted at the leadership level.
Who would struggle with this community?
  • People who enjoy sacramental liturgy and traditional celebration of the Holy Communion.
  • People who are highly theologically educated or interested in deep debate on contentious theological and political issues
  • People who need symbols in their church, liturgical seasons and colours represented, and extensive scripture read from throughout the bible, all of which are missing in this kind of contemporary reworking of worship life.

I am impressed with their friendliness, warmth and generous welcome during my visit, as well as their intercessory prayer. However, I think there are many concerns about this church claiming to be in the Anglican tradition. I think its expression of Christian faith is like warm porridge religion, comfortable and filling, but bland and without deeper substance for the maturing soul.

SCORECARD

Welcome: 4/5
liturgical sense: 3/10
Music: 6/10
Technology Use: 3/5
Sacramental aptitude: 3/10
Building look and comfort: 3/5
Children Friendly: 4/5Anglican-like Worship: 3/10
OVERALL:  29/60 OR 48%

Reason: too many parts of worship missing, lack of bible read, basic preaching, no confession, no lord's prayer, lack of respect for the sacrament, simple use of bible teaching, songs and prayers felt like a Baptist youth group and bible study. 
John Gumbley


Saturday, 4 January 2014

Blog Intro

The mission of this Blog is to visit as many Sydney Evangelical Anglican Churches as possible in a twelve month period. The purpose of the visit is to notate and analyse the Evangelical  people of God at worship in the Sydney Anglican Diocese, and to critique these churches so people understand what is actually occurring 'on the ground' in the most extreme Anglican Diocese in the country. Many people speak about the Sydney Evangelical Churches without experiencing them first hand. So I will do so, and then offer a voice from a highly trained and educated Anglican leader to what I see as the main issues. I will make every effort to respond to those who wish to open a dialogue about such issues.

To accomplish this task I myself will be completing all visits and talk to as many people at the Church I visit as possible, clergy and lay.

I have equipped myself for this task by completing considerable theological studies and forty years in the church, thirteen of which I was leading Anglican Churches in three different Dioceses. My studies over twenty years include BA (Macquarie), BD Hons. (Melbourne), Dip Min (Melbourne), MTheol. Hons.(Melbourne), Post Grad Diploma of Education (ACU, Strathfield) and Diploma of Accounting (NSI).